[In progress] TERMINATOR 2 Blu-ray regrade to 35mm

[cetya]

here is 2015 BD vs "Super 35 print" - "https://slow.pics/c/qr0UOzfb"

[Beber]

I'll probably go with the Rutracker for the steel factory, the more yellow one, as it fits better my recollection of the screening I attended (very much yellow with a bit of orange in it). Of course, it could vary depending on the shots.



The Sarah 6 month review will be tricky to decide: the photograph I got here, taken during a screening, shows a barely greenish grey wall behind Silberman and a very natural look. The scans I collected all show different interpretations of that scene.





Also, the end of the steel factory is bluer on the photograph, and the Rutracker is the bluer and less orangy red one:




Of course, the photographs probably are not entirely reliable when shooting a projection screen, but the other photographed moments look quite right and consistent with the scans. We have the blue future war with pink lasers, we have the dusk grading in the chase and in the alley after the chase, we have the rather pale face of Arnie putting the glasses on with a very blue pavement:





My 3 best scans will be the "Super 35", the Rutracker and the 1080p SDR rendering of the old HDRish 2160p release which also show a rather cold grading in the streets between Sarah's review and the Galleria, so that's 2 in favor of a cold grading there, just like the 2017 remaster. It seems the L.A. warmth is absent at that moment of the day. That 1080p scan might be useful to decide which one to lean towards when there's a discrepancy between the Rutracker and the "Super 35".

[david49120]

I have this scan in the top right corner where you can see Arnold with the shotgun. It reminds me the old vhs pictures. I never saw T2 in theatre, only in vhs, LD and dvds. I am therefore more accustomed to this scan even i think faces are too orange. It was very interesting when Zoidbefg argued on that 70 mm scan. I don't have much hope for next T2 scan being released in theaters soon.

[Beber]

Here's for the street scene between the 6 month review and the Galleria :

Rutracker rather warm / Super 35 rather cold green.


Rob's much warmer / old 1080p rather cold blue.


2017 remaster, rather cold green.


Rutracker / Super 35.

Rob's / old 1080p.


It could be one of the scenes where the 2017 3D remaster was not too wrong... It's another head-scratcher 'cause it seems to be the only moment of that day, assuming the Super-35 was not tampered with, when we don't feel the Southern California warmth outside. The morning felt warmer and sunny and, of course, the chase approaching dusk time. Since it's not in real time, we don't know for how long John and his pal were in the Galleria before they were found.

[sanjuro_61]

THe so called Rob's and rutracker are the same scan (exact same specles of dirt on both). White point on Rob's is BADLY made, so, yeah, ignore that one.

Honestly, I would not match the colors to any of the prints, at least not exactly what you see. If we assume two different prints can look different, then there's no such thing as THE 35mm colors. Needless to say, no matter how passionate we, fans, are, these are, in the end, amateur scans of prints that are often not in the best condition, meaning, the colors may have faded. I've taken a look at last to the super35... most of the daylight scenes look reddish, a bit faded/washed out to me (pretty much all of them except for those before the galleria).
Use the best looking one as reference, of course (and also, I wouldn't use colormatch either, as all of them have their flaws. Use the color wheels in Resolve, or whatever, to get the desired looks, that's the way. ).

[Beber]

There is THE grading. It’s on the IP. Prints are made out of it and their looks vary mildly, depending on film stock: Fuji, Kodak... But overall they all look about the same. The differences are negligible to the general audience. Now what we have here are several amateur scans with further processing and alterations afterwards... or not. The problem is we know Rob alters them with LUTs, we don’t know what the Rutracker guys did to obtain their grading of the same scan, and we don’t know what the "Super-35" guys did either after their scanning process. We don’t know what the "old 1080p" guys did to their scan either (the one with the missing bit when John is crying in the car). There's no way in 1991 people saw a blue scene in a theater that someone else saw warm in another theater and another one saw green whether they were Fuji, Kodak, Eastman... The mild differences cannot be this drastic. I did attend an actual screening and have a general idea on how it looks like and have some shots in mind, but I don’t have recollections of every scene specificities obviously. Overall, the Rutracker and the "Super-35" are quite similar looking and match the overall look I want to obtain as I saw it myself, so I figure the "old 1080p" and photographs will serve as referees when there are drastic discrepancies... and maybe testimonies from people who will go to the Prince Charles Cinema from late August to late September.

[Beber]

For those wondering, and who managed to get the "Super 35" scan, it's in sync with the 2015 Blu-ray with a +44 frame delay, so +1835 ms and any audio or subtitle track in sync with the 2015 Blu-ray will match the "Super 35" scan.